Skip to content
BlendPress

Tetris Couldn't Win at The Game Awards — A New Category Might Solve This

Each time a significant awards ceremony approaches, one notices a clamor for the addition additional classifications to honor unsung work and delight the hearts of enthusiasts who have specialized interests.

A fellow writer has already made supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are tabletop games, which is a passionate advocate's mission. But they will have to forgive me if I try to elbow in front because like all dedicated enthusiasts, I possess a compelling case backing this proposal stands as crucial and important of all. The demand is this: We need an award type for logic-based games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; opinions vary greatly, and typically spark debates concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason movie academies steer clear of genre categories. Yet it remains an unavoidable compromise in the world of gaming, showing incredible range they hardly constitute as a single art form.

For the full spectrum of gaming accomplishments to be recognized, and for games of all stripes to compete fairly, genre categories are essential.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies presently include classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these classifications effectively encompass numerous genres, making space possible for most games within them.

This doesn't apply to logic-based experiences. No appropriate category exists to put them. Consider three of outstanding current releases, all very different: the architectural riddles from a specific release, intense tile-matching in a different title, engaging interpersonal challenges in another game. Which classification works between these six categories? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist of brilliant puzzle games released every year lacking appropriate categories during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit award groups including Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested Indie races.

  • One classic puzzle game wasn’t nominated in any category in 2014
  • Another creative title was excluded that year
  • Popular arranging title received no acknowledgment in 2021
  • Just some brain-teasers barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications

Importance of Logic Titles

Commonly they're compact experiences, but the art of the puzzle game holds tremendous importance. Iconic mobile puzzle games rank among most engaged experiences worldwide continuing this trend for an extended period.

The famous puzzle experience challenges famous sandbox experiences for the title of most purchased experience; it additionally competes as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Logic titles wouldn't face that issue. You could fill multiple candidates engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude so many good games out.

To emphasize again, these include experiences that otherwise have no home in important events. Puzzle game makers function at the challenging frontier interactive creation, developing some of most fundamental forms of gaming itself. Just like cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.

The writer

Brian Anthony

A tech-savvy writer passionate about digital trends and innovation, with a background in journalism and a love for storytelling.

BlendPress

Type to search articles.